The Agua Buena
Human Rights

San José Costa Rica
Teléfonos: (506) 2280-3548
P.O.Box: 366-2200 Coronado

Need a places to
stay in San Jose?

We have rooms for rent click here for more information


Section: India
April 2005

Millions in Global Fund grants go unused:

Indian Government Bureacracies Kill Off People Living with AIDS.

by Richard Stern***

While hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance for AIDS pour into  India from international donor sources including the Global Fund,only 5,000  People Living with HIV/AIDS  (PLWA)  are  receiving   anti-retroviral treatment through the public sector.  Incredible negligence on the part of the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) and the Health Ministry combine to systematically create  a form of "bureacratic genocide," contributing to the deaths  thousands of PLWA who need treatment now. According to the World Health Organization (WHO),   700,000 people in  India urgently require treatment. About 100,000 die each year, nearly 300 each day. As of this moment, all public sector treatment in  India is provided by governments funds, channeled through NACO.   Yet $122 million in additional funds  for ARV access has been available for nearly a full year from the Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM), but not one dollar has  been disbursed from Geneva to India for Anti-retroviral access. While  the money  remains in the bank,   Mumbai's JJ Hospital is the  only  publicly funded facility in that city where PLWA currently receive  free treatment. A staff of two overworked   counselors try to see 180 patients each morning who come to the  Clinic.  Counselors must deal with adherence and other issues for the 1,350 PLWA now  receiving free  treatment at this hospital.  Yet hospital staff have  indicated that,  as of April 1st no more PLWA can be placed on treatment.  The  Mumbai AIDS Control Center has decided that the JJ program is saturated. 

Mumbai is India's largest city with a population of  16 million. Experts agree that at least 30,000 people in Mumbai need treatment  now.   The government will supposedly  begin providing free treatment at three  additional  hospitals, called "medical colleges,"  in the near future but the cap for each of these hospitals will be 500 patients, meaning that a total number of 2,800 people, could be placed on treatment by the end of 2005 in Mumbai, leaving 27,000 or 90% still without ARV access.  Of these 27,000 an estimated 8,000 will die during the year.

No Treatment for Children with AIDS

Although Mumbai AIDS Control Center staff acknowledged that 1,500  children are known to need treatment, and despite a thriving low cost generic manufacturing industry,  incredibly  there are no pediatric AIDS  suspensions available.  Children over 13 are given  pills for adults  but there is no treatment for children under 13.  The WHO representative for Mumbai, Dr. Dilip Vasvani informed me that there are "plans" to begin providing treatment for children at a facility in Northeast Mumbai  that already provides medical services for children but he would not be specific about a date. Few if any of the  PLWA we met in Mumbai had any information about the  Global Fund or the reason for the delays in disbursal. .  In India's first AIDS related  Global Fund project approved in round two, over two years ago,  $100 million was made available to India by the Fund.  Incredibly, India's "Country Coordinating Mechanism" (CCM) only asked for funds to treat 5,000 people over a five  year period. At current prices, treatment for 5,000 people represents only about $800,000 out of the total approved of  $100 million, less than one percent. However, it is a mute point, since  none of the people who could be treated with Global Fund money  have even been placed on treatment as of this date.   Global Fund projects are "country driven" meaning that the Fund does not mandate that a country ask for funds for treatment in their proposals.   A year and  a half later, in the fourth round, India did ask for funds for treatment access,  but the grant agreement has never been signed (See Table summarizing Global Fund Grants below)

WHO's Dr. Vasvani  acknowledged that he himself knows little about the Global Fund roll-out in India.  He indicated that ARV roll-out would be slow at first to assure quality of care, but could not explain why the "cap" of 2,800 had been placed on Access for Mumbai for the year 2005, when so many are urgently in need of treatment.  In all of India 5,000 people are on treatment in six major centers, but NACO had originally announced that treatment would be available 100,000 by the end of 2005. In early February, the NACO estimate was dramatically lowered, in spite of available funds,  and the goal is now to have 100,000 people on treatment by the end of 2007, a decision that defies logic given the resources available to the government from donor sources. 

For most questions I posed  regarding the Global Fund and general ARV policy,  Dr. Vasvani referred to me Dr. Alka Gogate, Director of the Mumbai AIDS Control Center,  the local branch of NACO which is responsible for Mahrashtra state.

In spite of a confirmed appointment that I had made directly with Dr. Gogate for Tuesday March 29th, at 3 pm she failed to appear and left no note or message relating to the  cancellation of this meeting.Although I never spoke with Dr. Gogate, documents provided by NGO's, indicated that in March of 2004 she had announced that medications for children would be a priority in Mumbai. She also indicated in the same report  that in Mumbai,  no one would receive treatment unless they had a "responsible ccompanying person" to insure adherence. I had no chance to ask her if she is aware  that this policy is against all "best practice" policies that entitle a person with AIDS to confidentiality. 

Global Fund Money Still Not Released

However information available on the Global Fund website reveals that $37 million has been available since the fourth round AIDS  project  was approved in June of 2004 for ARV treatment access to be provided at several major sites throughout the country, during a two year period, with an additional $85 million available for the following three years.   However, the grant agreement which would release these funds has still not  been signed, and there is still no specific information about when it will actually be signed.   According to the website, the $37 million would provide treatment for 44,300 PLWA during the first two years of the project. 

Informed sources claimed that the delay in signing the contract and disbursing the funds are due  to a range of issues related to internal government  and health ministry approvals and other "bureaucratic"  problems.  The Department of Economic Affairs of India is the "Principal Recipient" for the grant and  would implement the project.   It is astounding and disheartening that $37 million has been available to provide treatment for nearly a year, and could potentially have saved 45,000 lives,  yet the CCM and Principal Recipienthave not been able to complete the requirements needed in order to receive the funds and begin implementation of treatment.  More perplexing is the fact that NACO has been able to complete requisites for the small government financed treatment access roll-out, but not for the Global Fund roll-out which will cost the government nothing at all.

The Global Fund claims that it is trying to use partner Agencies including WHO and UNAIDS to speed up this process, but obviously the outcome remains lethal. 

The total amount available over the entire five year project  for scaling up from the 4th Round HIV grant would be about $122 million, with a  goal of placing 137,000 people on treatment during a five year period.  Yet, according to our own calculations based on current medication prices, for every $10 million dollars available, about 50,000 people should be able to receive treatment.  

Ironically,  a fourth round grant agreement was signed just weeks ago for  $4.2 million,  with a Consortium of five Indian NGO's.  But of this money, over $1.9 million is allocated for "infrastructure, human resources, and planning  and administration," while only $62,000 is for drugs, in this case  drugs for Opportunistic Infections.

Informed sources in Geneva indicated that India's various  GFATM grants could be canceled due to   lack of follow up as the two year review process approaches for the Round Two grant, and implementation is still bogged down in delays due to bureaucracy.

The reality for PLWA  in the streets and hospitals of Mumbai, is that the windfall of resources available in Geneva and New Delhi is being delayed by a small  army of paid bureaucrats,  while those who need treatment simply find a place to die.

Hospices in Mumbai

Nestled in the far Northeast corner of the city, six kilometers  from the end  the Mumbai railroad line is the Niramay Niketan AIDS Hospice. The day I visited about 50 PLWA were living  there, but none had access to ARV´s. 

"Not all of them are terminal" said Frank Furtado, Director of the program. "For those who can be treated for their OI´s, we try to get them out in 15 days.  Still, Furtado acknowledged that about 150 PLWA die each year at the Hospice and an unknown quantity after they have left.  Furtado himself expressed skepticism about placing hospice residents on ARVS unless sustainability was guaranteed. 

Founded in 1885 as  India´s first Leper Hospital, Niramay Niketan still houses 40 people suffering from leprosy.  The stigma

and suffering of untreated AIDS patients draws interesting parallels to earlier leper and TB  Sanitoriums, while today, despite

the fact that cheap and effective remedies exist, 98 percent of India's AIDS patients in Mumbai and throughout the country

are abandoned and left to die.  

The Neketen AIDS program began  in  2002 in a new building constructed with donations obtained by Furtado, and the entire project including leprosy as well as AIDS functions on a budget of US $5,000 per month.

Furtado, although he has directed the project since its opening,  was completely unaware of the Global  Fund or the money sitting unused in Dehli and Geneva.  Nor had he been told about the possibility of applying for a 5th round grant.

Furtado mentioned that there is a great shortage of staff at the Center but indicated that part of the problem is that there are not enough qualified nurses who are willing to work with PLWA.

Since my visit occurred during lunch, nurses and assistants were busy serving ample portions of food to the residents. Two wide eyed, but emaciated children, perhaps 5 years old stared at the pale faced intruder.

Each of the five AIDS units has its own TV and the center is immaculately  clean, in spite of  the staff shortages. Furtado proudly mentioned that his institution has always been willing to accept "eunuchs" as transgendered  people are known in India. 

Sex Workers Condemned to Death

Interestingly, at the JJ Hospital Center treatment program,  only 4 women out of 600 enrolled in the program are sex workers, even though Mumbai's infamous Red Light District is just three kilometers from the Hospital. An estimated 8,000 Sex Workers are HIV+.  According to one source, when sex workers begin to be ill, the men who run the brothels send them back to their home villages to die. They would avoid sending them to the Hospital for fear that authorities could obtain information about illegal activities  from the sick women.

In another AIDS hospice,  Jyothis Terminal Care, 50 kilometers North of Mumbai , The Director, Mrs. Bede informed me that all 73 available beds are filled. Only 4 of 73 PLWA have ARVs, those four as a result of donations made to the Hospice, Mrs.  Bede confirmed that Hospice records showed that of 800 persons who were admitted to the Hospice during the past five years, 400 are known to have died, but no information is available on several hundred others who eventually left the hospice. Less than 100 are known to be alive.

I asked Dr. Vasvani why no attempt was being made to utilize the hospices for disbursement of ARV's, given the fact that both Jyothis and Neketan have Physicians and nurses on staff.  He replied that "you have to move slowly with these kinds of things."   In fact, in Mumbai there  seems to be no shortage of infrastructure available in the Health Care system,  an issue frequently referred as an obstacle  in Sub-Saharan African countries and rural areas. But in Mumbai,  Doctors and Clinics abound and with the funds that should be flowing, could be enlisted in ARV roll-out programs. 

While I was  in India, a large paid advertisement  appeared in one of  Mumbai´s English language newspapers  (Mid-Day) soliciting proposals from NGO´s for the fifth round of Global Fund projects, but no such announcement appeared in any Hindi papers. It is estimated that 95% of PLWA in India speak no English, but many NGO directors as well as most government officials are fluent in English. No mention was made in the ad for proposals related to care and treatment.  Global Fund projects are country driven, according to Global Fund Board mandates, so there will be no intervention by the Fund to mandate proposals that would focus on access to ARV's for PLWA. With all the delays in disbursement of Funds in previously approved grants, it is questionable why India would even be applying for a Fifth Round grant.

Country Coordinating Mechanism Fails PLWA

Obviously the CCM in India  is a lot better at writing lucrative proposals  than at implementing them.  One wonders if the CCM should not be devoting its efforts to implementing current proposals, and what the real motivation is for soliciting Fifth round grants from a plethora of NGO's.  Perhaps the promise of money strategically delivered to some leading NGO's by the CCM may actually discourage meaningful activism, because some NGO's become reluctant to place pressure on the various Agencies involved for fear of losing their funding. 

Whereas most NGO directors we spoke to tended not to be overly critical of the AIDS treatment roll-out, one PLWA told me  through an interpreter.  "You are in India, but you don't understand.  To  the Indian government,  People with AIDS are unwanted.  They would happily be rid of us."  

India has long been a center of international activism as a result of  various  Indian generic companies which produce ARV's that are exported throughout the world at cheap prices.  While I was in India the new Patent act was passed over the b protests of Indian as well as international activists. This law  may have significant long range impact on the exportation of these drugs. There was major coverage in the Press regarding the Patent Act. But, over the years with all the attention focused on the Indian generic companies little or no attention has been focused on the fact that 98% of all Indians themselves lack access to the  inexpensive  ARVs that are manufactured by numerous companies in their own country.  

I obtained the detailed minutes of the regular  monthly ARV scale up meeting held in New Delhi on February 3rd of this year, and attended by WHO, and NACO employees, as well as many  international donor sources and civil society groups. Even as t government representatives were explaining,  the newly reduced goals in terms of scaling  up, no mention appears anywhere in the minutes  of the untapped  Global Fund resources. 

Lethal GFATM Policies

The Global Fund's own "country driven" orientation, which mandates only minimal intervention in National decision making regarding Fund  implementation is inextricably linked to the "genocidal" bureaucracy that is occurring in India.   It is clear  that neither the CCM nor the Principal Recipient in India are concerned about the fact that nearly 100,000 people may have died of AIDS since the 4th round grant was approved. But the Global Fund does not intervene,  (because of its "Board Policies"),  to implement project safeguards that would  stop the deaths of the Indian PLWA and get treatment to them.   So the Indian CCM and Principal Recipient  feel little or no pressure from its funding source to fulfill its obligations in a way that would be congruent with the life or death urgency of the situation.  Ultimately it is the Global Fund as well as the National AIDS program that are failing the multitudes of poor Indians wo need treatment. 

One of only three Civil Society Global Fund Board members worldwide  works in New Delhi at a large international Ageny,  but even her presence at the heart of where the struggle should be, seems to have generated little or  no impact.  

The Global Fund continues to  describe itself as a Funding Source only, and also as more of a "bank" than an implementing Agency.  This is distressingly accurate. Just the interest on $140 million dollars  sitting in a Swiss bank for a year, (at a 6 percent interest rate), would yield about $8 million, enough money to purchaseARVs for 40,000 PLWA for one full year at current prices. 

Current Status of India's Global Fund Grants that Focus on AIDS Treatment as of April, 2005

(Please note that approximately 200,000 People have died of AIDS in India since the Round 2 Grant

was approved, approximately 80,000 of these have died since the Round 4 grant was approved.)

Project Title

Date Approved

Amount Approved

and Available for the five year grant

Amount Disbursed as of

April, 2005

HIV prevention and care for PLWA through scaling up PMTCT services and public/ private

ARV treatment

January, 2003

(Round 2)

28 months ago

$100 million

$4.7 million

Access to Care and Treatment

June, 2004

(Round 4)

10 months ago

$140 million*




$240 million

$5.5 million

*$122 millon of this amount is available to the Government for Treatment Access, and $18 million

is for an NGO consortium which will not  be providing treatment.

**$800,000 has been disbursed to the NGO consortium, but not for ARV access.

***Director, Agua Buena Human Rights Association

San Jose, Costa Rica

Tel/Fax 506-2280-3548  

Assistant Director: Guillermo Murillo

(with thanks for editing to) Caribbean Coordinator: Eugene Schiff

Jaime Argueta, Guatemala/El Salvador

Mabel Martinez, Honduras/Nicaragua


© 1999-2001 Babroo Producciones
Diseñado y mantenido por Jorge Angulo